Doctors question Biden’s late-stage cancer diagnosis, suggest years-long cover-up
- A prominent urologist claims it's "unheard of" for Biden to suddenly discover advanced prostate cancer, suggesting he likely knew about it for years, raising concerns about transparency.
- Experts argue Biden’s aggressive Gleason 9 cancer couldn’t have developed recently, implying a possible long-term cover-up during his presidency and 2024 campaign.
- Biden’s recent physical declared him "healthy," but the sudden cancer diagnosis and speculation about prior drug use cast doubt on the White House’s honesty.
- The timing coincides with a forthcoming book alleging a cover-up of Biden’s cognitive decline, fueling suspicions of a distraction tactic.
- Biden’s brother hinted at serious health concerns, adding to the confusion, while experts and insiders question the administration’s credibility on the former president’s condition.
In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through political and medical circles, a prominent urologist has declared it "unheard of" for a former U.S. president with elite healthcare access to suddenly discover advanced prostate cancer with bone metastasis. Dr. David Shusterman, appearing on NewsNation, cast serious doubt on the White House’s timeline, suggesting President Joe Biden likely knew about his aggressive cancer, graded at Gleason 9, for years, possibly even a decade.
The implications are explosive: If true, the American public may have been deliberately
kept in the dark about Biden’s health during his presidency and the 2024 election cycle in hopes of improving Democrats' chances of holding onto the White House.
A timeline that doesn’t add up
It was announced on Sunday that Biden, 82, was diagnosed with prostate cancer after a routine exam detected a "small nodule" and urinary symptoms. The cancer, already metastasized to his bones, carries a Gleason score of 9. This is the second-highest grade, indicating a highly aggressive disease. Yet Dr. Shusterman and other experts argue such advanced cancer
doesn’t appear overnight.
"It’s unusual to hear that someone has prostate cancer when they’re annually being followed up. The fact that we find it at a Gleason 9 is unheard of," Shusterman said. "Most likely [he] had it for a long time… Aggressive prostate cancer grows over a long period of time—five to ten years—in the most aggressive form.”
He added, “Definitely evidence that he knew about this for a while."
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Biden transition advisor and oncologist, echoed this on MSNBC, stating Biden "did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days" and likely had it "while he was president." Even more damning, Dr. Howard Forman called it "inconceivable" that Biden’s elevated PSA levels—a standard prostate cancer marker—weren’t flagged earlier.
A pattern of opacity
This isn’t the first time Biden’s health transparency has been questioned. His February 2024 physical, conducted by White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor, declared him a "healthy, active, robust 81-year-old." Yet the sudden cancer revelation paired with Shusterman’s speculation that Biden may have been on Lupron, a cancer drug with fatigue side effects, raises alarming questions. Was the public misled about Biden’s fitness during his presidency?
The timing is also suspect. The diagnosis comes just as a forthcoming book promises to detail the White House’s alleged cover-up of Biden’s cognitive decline. Is this a diversion? While no one wishes illness on Biden or anyone else, the coincidence is hard to ignore.
A family’s cryptic remarks
Adding fuel to the fire, Biden’s brother Frank hinted at dire health struggles in a CBS interview, saying he wanted to enjoy "whatever time we have left" with Joe. A "family source" swiftly dismissed Frank as an "alcoholic," but the damage was done. The Bidens’ mixed messaging mirrors the administration’s erratic health disclosures.
If multiple doctors agree that Biden’s cancer couldn’t have progressed this far undetected, the logical conclusion is a cover-up. Whether it was to shield his electability or legacy, the lack of transparency erodes public trust. In a nation that values truth, Americans deserve answers, not politically convenient narratives. The question now is whether the media will demand them.
Sources for this article include:
YourNews.com
NYPost.com
NYPost.com
FoxNews.com